Run BTEC quality assurance for your whole centre in one place. Every cohort, assessor and IV sign-off sits on one dashboard, and the evidence trail your Standards Verifier asks for builds itself as your team works. Assessors keep the judgement; checkb.tech never awards a grade.
Follow one batch — Y13 Unit 3 Personal & Business Finance, Pearson set assignment Part A — from the assessor’s upload to IV sign-off and the centre’s SV audit view. Every screen is the real flow.
Name the batch after the class group — Y13 Business A — and set the cohort. Every script, verdict and note stays together, and the batch appears on the centre dashboard straight away.
Pick the unit — here, Unit 3 Personal & Business Finance — then the Pearson set assignment your centre follows, Part A. The criteria load straight from the specification: P1 through D1, watched from the first read.
Drop the folder in as students submitted it — word-processed reports, PDFs, slide decks. Each file goes up over a secure link and lands against the right name on the roster.
Each criterion comes back met, partly met or not met, quoting the learner’s own script. The assessor confirms or dismisses, the IV signs off, and the batch shows as ready for SV once no flags are open.
Quality nominees and lead IVs see every department and cohort at once: which batches are approved, which are waiting on IV, which were returned to the assessor, and which are ready for SV. Staff and learners are managed from the same place, with school sign-in and seat limits.
Every verdict maps to one criterion — met, partly met, not met — and quotes the exact line of learner work behind it. Assessor decisions and IV sign-off are logged with the batch, so the record is ready before the SV asks. The app never awards the grade.
“M1 is only partly met — you describe the variance on page 4 but don’t analyse the cause.” Drafts quote the student’s own script per criterion, so resubmissions target the right gap. Send as-is, copy for email, or pull the CSV for your tracking sheet.
P1 — met. Your budget is complete and arithmetic checks out.
M1 — partly met. You describe the variances (p.4 ¶2) but don’t yet analyse the cause. Cited: overspend on transport vs plan.
D1 — not met. No justification of choices yet — see the prompt in your action list.
The checker highlights generic phrasing, source similarity and gaps in vocational evidence, then suggests questions for an assessor to consider. These signals cannot establish who wrote a submission; review them alongside the work and your knowledge of the learner.
“Talk me through how you built the cash-flow forecast — what changed after week 2?”
This wasn’t built by a team guessing at what verification involves. It was built by a real BTEC IV.
Start with one department for your next assessment window. The centre pilot is free for two weeks, and every verdict sits beside the evidence, so your IVs can check the reasoning before the centre changes how it works.